tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post3156445206015428749..comments2023-10-31T05:07:19.353-04:00Comments on Delenda est Carthago: The Protocols of HeartlandDr. Φhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14086783503820477029noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-51013370273289468582012-02-23T21:53:54.559-05:002012-02-23T21:53:54.559-05:00Well yes, and in fact the authenticated documents ...Well yes, and in fact the authenticated documents aren't especially interesting apart from the fake memo. So the primary effect was to facilitate the forgery.Dr. Φhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14086783503820477029noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-42847012358255298002012-02-23T02:20:46.076-05:002012-02-23T02:20:46.076-05:00I actually agree - well, almost - on both counts.
...I actually agree - well, almost - on both counts.<br /><br />The only disagreement is that, at least morally, the two are not entirely separable (unless I am misunderstanding something). That is to say, the documents that he got through underhanded tactics that I might forgive in a vacuum. But those documents were used to try to perpetrate a particular fraud (if the latter accusation is accurate). Both in the sense that he took information of them to try to forge the document, and also that he tried to "hide a lie between two truths."<br /><br />In other words, had he gotten the documents and then simply passed them on, I would probably say "Okay, let's focus on the documents themselves" (the way he got him being the business of the courts and not me). But given the context in which they were used... I am less forgiving than you are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com