tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post5088515336957162438..comments2023-10-31T05:07:19.353-04:00Comments on Delenda est Carthago: The Social Intelligence HypothesisDr. Φhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14086783503820477029noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-60594378561519740922009-10-08T17:43:08.756-04:002009-10-08T17:43:08.756-04:00I'll cast a lone vote for the self-absorbed an...I'll cast a lone vote for the self-absorbed analysis - but not about "betas."<br /><br />I would follow William S. Lind's analysis of feminism - that it was a purely destructive idea, an offshoot of Cultural Marxism.<br /><br />However, this destruction was not aimed at "beta" men, but at Western Civilization.<br /><br />http://www.academia.org/lectures/lind1.html<br /><br />Roissy is a big exaggeration, I think. He's not entirely fake, IMHO - he probably has a few STDs to prove it. But he's 99% fake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-39114642963034698622009-10-08T02:19:18.843-04:002009-10-08T02:19:18.843-04:00Agree with above, this is near-total bs. Correlat...Agree with above, this is near-total bs. Correlation is not causation. <br /><br />I don't even poison my mind with his pornographic crapola.Justinhttp://religionnewsblog.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-8735740634630263422009-10-07T06:54:17.522-04:002009-10-07T06:54:17.522-04:00Trumwill: yeah, pretty self-absorbed. On the oth...Trumwill: yeah, pretty self-absorbed. On the other hand, if feminism <i>were</i> about screwing betas, how would it be different?Burkehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14252946969701576139noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-11015338870268547292009-10-06T21:57:17.531-04:002009-10-06T21:57:17.531-04:00The view that the entire social upheaval surroundi...The view that the entire social upheaval surrounding feminism was borne on the basis of screwing over betas is perhaps the most self-absorbed, self-centered thing I have heard the pro-beta folks say in quite some time. As the saying goes, "Not everything is about you, sweetheart."Trumwillhttp://hitcoffee.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-75379645510543750382009-10-06T21:36:34.117-04:002009-10-06T21:36:34.117-04:00Interesting take that feminism was in response to ...Interesting take that feminism was in response to beta men having too much power.<br /><br />I join Thursday in disagreeing. But I don't think that prosperity was it either. Certainly prosperity is what permits feminism to exist, but it was the view that the individual is the core atomistic particle of society that was causal. <br /><br />Feminism seeks to maximize autonomy for the female. That's it. Individual autonomy is a distinctly post-reformation, post-enlightenment concept.Elusive Wapitihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16825547465295622621noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-29763791.post-61003045294303037312009-10-06T20:14:13.908-04:002009-10-06T20:14:13.908-04:00Nah, Roissy's analysis is seriously flawed. Be...Nah, Roissy's analysis is seriously flawed. Beta males were in control for a long time without provoking feminism and there wasn’t any noticable increase in beta power. It’s not the variable. <br /><br />Increasing prosperity is what fueled earlier feminist movements, and female behavior under conditions of widely available birth control, female financial independence, and urban anonymity needed ideological justification and gave us the current wave.Thursdayhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13002311410445623799noreply@blogger.com