Posts
Ferdinand, in the context of attacking his anti-semitism, quotes Richard Hoste:
I would much rather have a people that seeks to kill those who offend them than a people that works behind the scenes to get you thrown in jail for opinions. The first are open and honest enemies of your civilization and inspire people to fight back, the second enlist your children in the cause of “fighting hate” as they destroy you in the name of love and tolerance.
The irony of this statement is that Western Christendom has conspicuously not closed ranks in racial or cultural solidarity against “open and honest” Muslim violence.
Why is this?
Is it because Muslims occupy the commanding heights of our media, education, and government?
Just askin’.
6 comments:
I think the door was opened to the rank-closing you describe after 9-11.
But before anything happened, our rulers and the media stomped on that pre-emptively, and anything that smelt of solidarity was painted as racist. It pretty effectively neutralized any practical cultural opposition to the religion of peace.
My theory? Christians do not occupy leadership posts in media or in government. But Marxists do, left-wing nominal Christians do,* and not a few Jews are in government and media as well. Both Marxists and the Jews, for different reasons, fear the power of organized Christianity and actively quash opposition before it starts. The nominal Christians don't want to appear bad and actively go along.
EW: please do not feed the trolls.
Dan: please confine your comments to the topic at hand. This is not a thread on the historical merits of any particular religion.
OUCH, censored by YOU? now i am totally convinced the world has gone crazy. when you, good sir, censor and delete me, there is no more room for discussion. Either you have an open forum or a closed forum, be clear sir. OUCH.
Post a Comment