Thursday, May 13, 2010

Time makes a mockery of us all.

At 35, Danica McKellar is just too old to make this compelling. That, or I'm too old to appreciate it.

You be the judge.

HT: Ace.


trumwill said...

Hmmm... no, not too old. My tastes are more... pedestrian... but no complaints at all.

Φ said...

I meant too old for the format, ie. playing the doxy for millions of horny strangers. Not too old to be considered quite attractive if we met her in real life.

That said, I've never been a fan of the lad mags. I get actual porn -- I don't approve of porn, but I'm not mystified by its appeal -- but Maxim, et al. leave me more annoyed than aroused.

ironrailsironweights said...

She looks just fine to me too. The pictures must have been taken a few months ago, as she doesn't look pregnant in them.


Sheila Tone said...

I have no idea who she is. As to the appropriateness -- hey, we're a nation of adolescents. There are probably plenty of over-40 guys who read Maxim (like your buddy Roissy, for example).

trumwill said...

Sheila, she's Winnie Cooper from The Wonder Years all grown up.

Phi, I get what you're saying but I think I still disagree. I think that dirty-sexy (for lack of a better term) doesn't have an expiration date of the mid-thirties if someone is well-kept. On the other hand, I do have strong act-your-age views that conflict with this somewhat. So I can understand the alternative perspective.