Cold Equations, discussing the Omaha Race Riot, writes:
Nowadays, the crime that inspired this riot would barely be newsworthy. Sites like American Renaissance post six cases like that before breakfast. Nobody cares except for some grumpy racialists. The idea that whites would react like this seems absurd now, but there it was.
A few possibilities:
- “Whites”, in this instance, is misleading. According to Wikipedia, the rioters were drawn from Irish and Eastern European immigrant communities. I’m not an expert on the period, but I would speculate that their posture in regards to the WASP establishment (Omaha’s mayor was named Edward Parsons Smith, a WASP name if there ever was one) was not unlike contemporary black attitudes toward whites today. For instance, WASP industrialists were using blacks as strikebreakers, and the rioters may not have believed that justice would be forthcoming from the establishment.
- We’re richer now, and can afford more morality. The working class was hard pressed back then in a manner that we can only imagine in the era of the welfare state. Today we have more to lose by engaging in extrajudicial violence.
- A corollary of the first two is a "woman shortage"; and one potentially more severe than what we face now. Again, I have no specific knowledge of this, but I'm pretty sure that men were overrepresented among turn-of-the-last-century immigrants. Combine poverty with outsider status and I would expect that a great many men in Omaha had neither a wife nor good prospects for obtaining one. Thus, news that one of "them" had forcibly poached one of "our" women would have had a much bigger psychological impact in 1919 than in 2010.
- Whites are in the final stages of decadence, and can no longer be roused to collectively defend ourselves.
Thoughts?
